Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Subaru Forester 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 56 HP less power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 30 NM more than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 11.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is larger. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |