Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Jeep Cherokee 2001

 
Nissan X-Trail
2001 - 2003
Jeep Cherokee
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 114 HP143 HP
Torque: 270 NM312 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds13.5 seconds
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan X-Trail engine produces 29 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.29.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km9.5 l/100km
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway930 km on highway
720 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.44 m
Width: 1.76 m1.82 m
Height: 1.68 m1.87 m
Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 19 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 410 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1841 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0502`160
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 20003600
Pros and Cons: Nissan X-Trail has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Jeep Cherokee has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv