Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Opel Frontera 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 1 HP less power than Opel Frontera, but torque is 10 NM more than Opel Frontera. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 15 cm shorter than the Opel Frontera, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 389 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1841 litres | 1790 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Opel Frontera may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Frontera, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`450 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`534 kg | 1`780 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 516 kg | 670 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem less than Opel Frontera. Therefore, Opel Frontera is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Frontera has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Opel Frontera has
| |