Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Mercedes ML 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 49 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 3`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes ML has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |