Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 83 HP less power than Mazda Tribute, but torque is 5 NM more than Mazda Tribute. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 12.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 14.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 5.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 840 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 430 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 11 cm longer than the Mazda Tribute, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 2245 litres | |
|
Mazda Tribute has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 47 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 404 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |