Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Kia Sorento 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 26 HP less power than Kia Sorento, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Kia Sorento. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sorento, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sorento. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sorento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm shorter than the Kia Sorento, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 890 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1841 litres | 1900 litres | |
|
Kia Sorento has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 480 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sorento. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Sorento (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Sorento, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`610 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`534 kg | 1`985 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 516 kg | 625 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Kia Sorento. Therefore, Kia Sorento is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Kia Sorento has
| |