Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Hyundai Terracan 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 36 HP less power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Hyundai Terracan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2001: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. Hyundai Terracan 2001: The base model is equipped with a button-operated part-time all-wheel drive system, while the Highlander variation features an automatic all-wheel drive system that is normally rear-wheel drive, but automatically assigns torque to the front wheels as required. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 20 cm shorter than the Hyundai Terracan, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1841 litres | 1955 litres | |
|
Hyundai Terracan has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 760 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Terracan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Terracan (by 114 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.8 metres less than that of the Hyundai Terracan, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`590 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`534 kg | 2`220 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 516 kg | 370 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Hyundai Terracan. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |