Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 23 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 13 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
| |