Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 57 HP less power than Mazda Tribute, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Mazda Tribute. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 12.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 14.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 430 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 11 cm longer than the Mazda Tribute, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 2245 litres | |
|
Mazda Tribute has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 47 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 404 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |