Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2003 engine produces 4 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail 2007, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Nissan X-Trail 2007. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail 2007 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan X-Trail 2003 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail 2007, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan X-Trail 2003 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail 2007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2003: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. Nissan X-Trail 2007: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 25 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2003 is smaller. Nissan X-Trail 2003 is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail 2007, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 1742 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2003 has 69 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail 2007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail 2003 (by 99 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail 2003 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail 2007. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |