Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 9 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 173 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 23 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 2091 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 105 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 250 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`793 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |