Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 7 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1841 litres | 1951 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`070 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`525 kg | 1`660 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 410 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |