Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 7 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 1951 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 12 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |