Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Opel Antara 2007

 
Nissan X-Trail
2003 - 2006
Opel Antara
2007 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 136 HP150 HP
Torque: 314 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds10.3 seconds
Opel Antara is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan X-Trail engine produces 14 HP less power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Opel Antara. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.27.5
Real fuel consumption: 8.0 l/100km9.0 l/100km
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway950 km on highway
750 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km530'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera TinoInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Opel Antara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.85 m
Height: 1.68 m1.70 m
Nissan X-Trail is smaller.
Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1841 litres1420 litres
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Nissan X-Trail has 40 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The Opel Antara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 421 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters12.4 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.8 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0502`225
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Opel Antara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Opel Antara, so Opel Antara quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 26004400
Rating in user reviews: 7.1/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Nissan X-Trail has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Opel Antara has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv