Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 4 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 4 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 13 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1841 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 131 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`525 kg | 1`665 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 685 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |