Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Kia Sorento 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 392 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 34 HP less power than Kia Sorento, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Kia Sorento. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sorento, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sorento. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sorento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 8 cm shorter than the Kia Sorento, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 486 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1841 litres | 1751 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 76 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sorento. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.4 metres less than that of the Kia Sorento, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`460 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`525 kg | 1`965 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 495 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Kia Sorento has
| |