Nissan X-Trail 2005 vs Hyundai Tucson 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 4 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, but torque is 9 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 19 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 1856 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 234 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 15 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |