Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 1 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, but torque is 8 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Tucson engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena, Nissan Sentra | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 19 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 234 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |