Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 169 HP | 166 HP | |
Torque: | 233 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 3 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Nissan X-Trail 2007: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 25 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Nissan X-Trail is 11 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 556 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | 955 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 77 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 787 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`160 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4600 | 5000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |