Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 3 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 57 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 295 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |