Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 232 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 1 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 295 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |