Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 110 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | 774 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan X-Trail has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The Mazda CX-7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 968 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`301 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |