Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Peugeot 4007 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 6 HP less power than Peugeot 4007, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Peugeot 4007. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 4007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail and Peugeot 4007 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1742 litres | 1686 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 31 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 4007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 56 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.2 metres less than that of the Peugeot 4007, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 2`410 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`637 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 533 kg | 620 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Peugeot 4007. Therefore, Peugeot 4007 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Peugeot 4007 has
| |