Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 6 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 295 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |