Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 10 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 62 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |