Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 303 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 51 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 17 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used also on Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is larger. Nissan X-Trail is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | 1691 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 77 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |