Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Kia Sorento 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 392 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Kia Sorento is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 20 HP less power than Kia Sorento, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Kia Sorento. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sorento, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sorento. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm longer than the Kia Sorento, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 486 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | 1751 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 7 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sorento. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Sorento (by 9 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Sorento. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Kia Sorento has
| |