Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 16.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 38 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 31 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 165 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |