Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 156 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Citroen C-Crosser is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 6 HP less power than Citroen C-Crosser, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Citroen C-Crosser. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
1040 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Nissan X-Trail has 4x4: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Crosser, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 1 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 184 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 184 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 479 litres | 441 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | 1686 litres | |
In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 38 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 56 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C-Crosser, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`410 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Citroen C-Crosser has
| |