Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Subaru Forester 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 9 HP less power than Subaru Forester, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.4 | |
| Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy, Subaru XV | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 29 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |