Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 35 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 51 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Grand Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 60 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 184 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 295 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |