Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 8 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.6 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2010 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan X-Trail has 17 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The Toyota RAV4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |