Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 29 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 117 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Used also on Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 1 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 412 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 191 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
| |