Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail and Suzuki Grand Vitara have the same engine power, but Nissan X-Trail torque is 6 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.7 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 34 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 758 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 205 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |