Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 222 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 2 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.9 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 292 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 603 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1792 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |