Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 22 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.5 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 591 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan X-Trail has 12 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |