Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 169 HP | 166 HP | |
Torque: | 233 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 3 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.5 | |
Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Nissan X-Trail 2010: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 25 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 8600 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |