Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2010

 
Nissan X-Trail
2010 - 2014
Honda CR-V
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 169 HP166 HP
Torque: 233 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds11.3 seconds
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive.
Nissan X-Trail engine produces 3 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.69.5
Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway780 km on highway
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Nissan X-Trail 2010: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating.

Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking.

Engines

Engine production duration: 24 years15 years
Engine spread: Used also on Nissan SentraUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.57 m
Width: 1.79 m1.82 m
Height: 1.68 m1.68 m
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 479 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`050no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

above average
Honda CR-V has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 86008600
Pros and Cons: Nissan X-Trail has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Honda CR-V has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv