Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 31 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 16 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 15 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |