Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 53 HP less power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 20 NM more than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.5 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 16 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |