Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Subaru Forester 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 3 HP more power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 30 NM less than Subaru Forester. Despite the higher power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Outback, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 2`080 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |