Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 10 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 30 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.6 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used also on Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 1 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 412 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 67 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |