Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 and Nissan X-Trail 2007 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail 2010 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail 2007, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail 2010 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail 2007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail 2010 and Nissan X-Trail 2007 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 479 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |