Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander have the same engine power, but Nissan X-Trail torque is 60 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 771 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 292 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |