Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 422 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 47 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 102 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 528 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 49 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.1 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |