Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 6 HP less power than Citroen C-Crosser, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Citroen C-Crosser. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Crosser, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 479 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 38 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C-Crosser, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Citroen C-Crosser has
| |