Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 34 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used also on Opel Antara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 479 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1577 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 2 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |