Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs BMW X3 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 60 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan X-Trail is 1 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 71 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| BMW X3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
BMW X3 has
| |