Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Audi Q5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 95 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 260 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used also on Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Audi Q5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 61 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |