Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Audi Q5 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 90 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A4, Audi A5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Audi Q5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 61 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 195 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |