Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Subaru Forester 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail and Subaru Forester have the same engine power, but Nissan X-Trail torque is 2 NM less than Subaru Forester. Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.2 | |
| Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 488 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1577 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`070 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |