Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 171 HP | 167 HP | |
Torque: | 233 NM | 222 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.9 | |
Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 25 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 292 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 292 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 497 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1792 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`210 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 9200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |